“He talked about feeling incredibly lonely and isolated,” Emma told the inquest. “When it came out he had no case to answer, he believed his reputation would still be ruined.”
Emma also described significant procedural delays and perceived lack of support from the police force, including:
- A 36-day delay in appointing an investigation manager.
- A lack of communication regarding the review of his suspension.
- Failure to explore alternatives to suspension, such as working remotely.
Circumstances Leading to Death
Emma disclosed that the couple discussed taking time apart the night before Michael’s death, but she assured him the separation was not permanent. On March 25, she was contacted by a neighbor who reported seeing police near Michael’s car. Shortly after, she was informed of his death. A previous hearing determined that Michael died by suspension from ligature.
In her statement, Emma criticized the handling of her husband’s case, saying: “I feel that Mike was completely failed. Policy and procedures were not followed, which let him down. Had he been treated fairly and with compassion, I believe he would be here now.”
Police Response
Chief Inspector Sarah Johns, who served the suspension notice to Michael, testified that the decision to suspend him was made to protect the integrity of the investigation. She stated that allowing him to work from home was deemed inappropriate, as it could risk discussions with colleagues involved in the case.
Reflecting on the situation, Chief Inspector Johns admitted she should have been clearer in her instructions about whom Michael could communicate with during the investigation. “With hindsight, I now realize I should have put it in writing exactly what I meant,” she said.
Wife’s Plea for Accountability
Emma highlighted the lack of a support network for Michael, noting he was prohibited from discussing the allegations with colleagues. Although colleagues were directed to send messages of support through a welfare officer, she said this left Michael feeling isolated and unsupported.
“He was cut off from his local support network,” she explained. “Had he been treated with fairness and compassion, this tragedy could have been avoided.”
Ongoing Inquest
The inquest is set to continue, examining the processes and decisions made during the investigation and their potential impact on Michael’s mental health. The case raises critical questions about how internal investigations are handled and the duty of care owed to staff under scrutiny.
For support, contact the Samaritans on 116 123 or visit their website at www.samaritans.org.
