A massive backlash against Sir Keir Starmer’s mandatory digital ID scheme has erupted. Today, a Westminster Hall debate took centre stage after almost three million Brits signed a petition slamming the plan as a “step towards mass surveillance and digital control.” Tory MP Robbie Moore kick-started the debate, while Cabinet Office Minister Josh Simons defended the Government’s controversial move.
Digital ID Sparks Cross-Party Fury
The petition, launched in July, has rocketed to nearly three million signatures from all across the political map. Labour strongholds such as Rossendale and Darwen, Burnley, and Great Grimsby are leading the opposition. But it’s not just Labour voters worried – DUP-held Upper Bann, Lib Dem Torbay, and even Tory seat Maldon have shown strong resistance.
This wide-ranging dissent exposes deep public unease breaching party lines. Concerns centre on fears that the digital ID could usher in a surveillance state and erode privacy.
Government Pushes Ahead Despite Outcry
On 2nd October, the Department for Science, Innovation and Technology reaffirmed the Government’s commitment. “We will introduce a digital ID within this Parliament to help tackle illegal migration, make accessing Government services easier, and enable wider efficiencies,” they said.
The plan aims to roll out mandatory digital IDs well before the next election due by 2029. Critics slam it as a government overreach disguised as a convenience tool – with privacy watchdogs warning of data misuse and breaches.
Westminster Hall Debate: Liberty vs. Control
Tory MP Robbie Moore led the charge to spotlight public concerns. Speaking on the petition’s huge support, he positioned the Opposition as defenders of freedoms against Labour’s digital surveillance ambitions. Meanwhile, Josh Simons attempted to portray the ID scheme as necessary and beneficial.
Though Westminster Hall debates don’t bind the Government, this high-profile showdown propels the digital ID controversy into the national spotlight. With nearly three million signatures, pressure mounts on Starmer to rethink or dilute his plans.
