In an ongoing trial that has captivated public attention, a woman who claims to have engaged in sexual acts with a celebrity when she was 16 vehemently denied suggestions from a defence barrister that she had never been in the accused man’s house.
During the second day of her cross-examination, the defence barrister put forth the argument that the woman had never been to the defendant’s home and was unable to identify it to the police. The accused, who is now in his 40s and cannot be named for legal reasons, has pleaded not guilty to three counts of engaging in sexual acts with a child under the age of 17 in dublin" title="Dublin" data-wpil-keyword-link="linked" data-wpil-monitor-id="40104">Dublin between August and December 2010.