In a highly anticipated trial, former sheriff’s deputy Scot Peterson has been acquitted of charges related to his alleged failure to protect students during the 2018 shooting at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School in Parkland, Florida. After deliberation, the jury found Peterson not guilty of 11 charges, including felony child neglect, culpable negligence, and perjury.
During the devastating attack, which ranks among the deadliest school shootings in U.S. history, Peterson, who served as the school’s resource officer, remained outside the building while the gunman carried out his rampage, resulting in the tragic loss of 17 lives and leaving 17 others injured.
The announcement of the verdict in a Fort Lauderdale court prompted an emotional response from Peterson. Overwhelmed by the unanimous decision, he broke down in tears and was comforted by his attorney, who also showed visible emotion.
Prosecutors argued that Peterson had failed to follow his training during the incident that occurred on February 14, 2018. However, the defence focused on highlighting Peterson’s extensive career and contended that he was disoriented regarding the source of the gunfire. Furthermore, they asserted that Peterson did not fit the legal definition of a “caregiver” typically applied to parents or daycare providers, as he was not directly responsible for the student’s safety.
The trial’s outcome has elicited a range of reactions, underscoring the ongoing debate surrounding the responsibility of law enforcement officers in such critical situations. While some argue that Peterson should have taken immediate action to confront the shooter, others fear that holding him criminally liable could set a precedent with far-reaching implications for officers facing similar circumstances.
