In a controversial ruling, Moroccan activist Abdul Rahman Zankad has been sentenced to five years in prison for his outspoken criticism of Morocco’s decision to normalise relations with Israel. The verdict has drawn widespread condemnation from human rights groups and political observers.
Background
The trial of Zankad has become a focal point in the ongoing debate over Morocco’s ties to Israel. As the conflict in Gaza continues, tensions have escalated, and dissenting voices have faced increasing scrutiny. Critics argue that the government is using legal measures to suppress opposition and stifle dissent.
Charges and Verdict
Zankad was found guilty of two charges:
- Insulting a Constitutional Institution: The court deemed Zankad’s statements as disrespectful towards a constitutional institution, leading to his conviction on this charge.
- Incitement: Zankad’s vocal opposition to the normalisation of relations with Israel was seen as incitement against the government’s policies. His calls for reversing the decision were met with legal repercussions.
Public Outcry
Tens of thousands of protesters from diverse political backgrounds have taken to the streets across Morocco to express their solidarity with Palestinians and denounce Israel. The demonstrations have also targeted Morocco’s alignment with Israel, with chants demanding the government to “overturn normalisation”.
International Response
Human rights organisations and international observers have raised concerns about freedom of expression and the right to dissent in Morocco. They view Zankad’s case as emblematic of broader issues related to civil liberties and government accountability.
The United States, a key ally of Israel, has also faced criticism during these protests. Demonstrators have voiced their disapproval of the U.S. administration’s support for Israel and its role in facilitating diplomatic ties between Morocco and Israel.
