Three members of a Huddersfield family are expected to return to prison after the Supreme Court reinstated convictions relating to serious injuries suffered by a vulnerable woman who was left in a persistent vegetative state.

Asgar Sheikh and his parents, Khalid Sheikh and Shabnam Sheikh, were jailed in February 2024 after being convicted of causing or allowing serious physical harm to Asgar’s wife, Ambreen Sheikh.

Asgar’s sister, Shagufa Sheikh, received a suspended sentence.

Ambreen had moved from Pakistan to Huddersfield to begin a new life before suffering a severe burn to her lower back and buttocks at the family home.

She subsequently became unconscious and was left in a persistent vegetative state.

During proceedings, Ambreen was described as a bright and ambitious young woman.

Jurors at the original trial heard that she suffered the burn before being given glimepiride, a medication used to treat diabetes, which caused her condition to deteriorate further.

Convictions previously overturned

The family’s convictions for causing or allowing serious physical injury were quashed by the Court of Appeal in January last year.

Appeal judges concluded there was insufficient evidence for a jury to find that the administration of glimepiride had been carried out maliciously and ruled that defence submissions of “no case to answer” should have succeeded.

The Crown Prosecution Service challenged that decision at the Supreme Court, arguing that the original convictions should be restored.

In a ruling delivered in July, Supreme Court judges agreed with the CPS and reinstated the convictions.

The Supreme Court concluded that the original trial judge had not misdirected the jury and had been entitled to reject the defence argument that there was no case to answer.

Separate convictions for perverting the course of justice had not been challenged.

Those offences related to delays in obtaining medical assistance for Ambreen and attempts to conceal the circumstances surrounding how she became unconscious.

Three expected to return to custody

Asgar, Khalid and Shabnam Sheikh were originally each sentenced to seven years and nine months in prison.

Following the Supreme Court ruling, they are expected to be summoned before Leeds Crown Court, where the decision will be formally recorded.

They are then expected to be returned to custody to serve the remainder of their sentences.

We are your go-to destination for breaking UK news, real-life stories from communities across the country, striking images, and must-see video from the heart of the action.

Follow us on Facebook at for the latest updates and developing stories, and stay connected on X (Twitter) the for live coverage as news breaks across the UK.

SIGN UP NOW FOR YOUR FREE DAILY BREAKING NEWS AND PICTURES NEWSLETTER

Your information will be used in accordance with our Privacy Policy

YOU MIGHT LIKE

TWO TIER JUSTICE # Danny Tommo refused bail and remanded in custody after denying Channel boat charges Anti-migration activist Daniel Thomas, known as Danny Tommo, has been **refused bail and remanded in custody** after pleading not guilty to charges arising from an incident involving a boat in the English Channel. The 37-year-old appeared at Basingstoke Magistrates’ Court on Friday and denied one count of criminal damage and a separate offence under Section 53 of the Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act 2000 relating to an alleged failure to disclose the PIN to his mobile phone. Thomas had applied for bail, but the court refused the application and ordered that he remain in custody. He is now due to appear at **Portsmouth Crown Court on Tuesday, September 29**. The criminal damage allegation relates to an incident in the Channel on Tuesday, September 22. Hampshire and Isle of Wight Constabulary said the charge followed an allegation that a boat was damaged while an emergency responder was on board. During Friday’s hearing, prosecutors alleged Thomas used a knife to damage the vessel. Thomas has pleaded not guilty and the allegation has not been proved. He also denies the RIPA offence concerning his phone PIN. Stephen Yaxley-Lennon, known as Tommy Robinson, attended court in support of Thomas, following a demonstration involving several hundred people outside Hampshire Constabulary’s Police Investigation Centre in Basingstoke on Thursday evening. Claims circulating on social media say Thomas’s legal team proposed a package of bail conditions including electronic monitoring, restrictions preventing him from approaching the coast and restrictions on social-media use. **Those specific proposed conditions have not yet been confirmed in the published court reports reviewed by UKNIP.** Thomas remains in custody pending his next appearance. Proceedings are active and Thomas is entitled to a fair trial. He has pleaded not guilty and the allegat