Met Police Chief Slams Palestine Action as “Extremist Criminal Group” Ahead of Protest
The Metropolitan Police Commissioner, Sir Mark Rowley, has slammed Palestine Action ahead of a planned protest, branding the group an “organised extremist criminal group” and warning that proscribing it as a terrorist organisation is under active consideration.
Rowley Unleashes Warning Over Palestine Action
Sir Mark did not hold back. He highlighted serious allegations against Palestine Action members, including wielding sledgehammers against police officers, breaking into military sites, and racking up millions in criminal damage.
“This is an organised extremist criminal group,” said Sir Mark Rowley. “Members are alleged to have caused millions of pounds of criminal damage, assaulted a police officer, and claimed responsibility for breaking into an airbase.”
Despite not having legal grounds to ban tomorrow’s protest outright, Rowley confirmed police will enforce strict conditions to stop disruption to Parliament, Westminster, and the public.
“Until then, we have no power in law to prevent tomorrow’s protest taking place,” he said. “We do, however, have the power to impose conditions on it to prevent disorder, damage, and serious disruption to the community.”
Police Push for Terror Ban on Palestine Action
The Met has officially presented an operational case urging the government to ban Palestine Action under terrorism laws. If approved, anyone campaigning or supporting the group could face criminal prosecution.
Rowley acknowledged public frustration over the protests but made it clear that violent or criminal actions tied to such groups won’t be tolerated.
“The right to protest is essential and we will always defend it, but actions in support of such a group go beyond what most would see as legitimate protest.”
He wrapped up with a stern warning: “Breaches of the law will be dealt with robustly.”
Who Are Palestine Action?
The group has gained notoriety for high-profile protests targeting arms manufacturer sites, often involving criminal damage. While they spotlight international human rights, their methods have sparked fierce debate over what counts as lawful protest.
The Home Office has yet to comment on the ban prospect but is expected to review the Met’s evidence soon.
