Three Metropolitan Police officers have avoided dismissal despite being part of a WhatsApp group...

Published: 9:00 pm April 15, 2025
Updated: 1:08 pm October 8, 2025
Three Met Officers in WhatsApp Group Mocking Rape Victim and Disabled People Avoid Dismissal – UKNIP

 

Three Metropolitan Police officers have avoided dismissal despite being part of a WhatsApp group in which their supervisor made graphic and offensive comments about rape victims, race, and disabled people.

PCs Kentafi Lindill, James Humphrey, and Craig Hawkins were found to have breached professional standards but will remain in their roles after being handed written warnings of 18 to 24 months following a disciplinary hearing.

The uk/tag/whatsapp" title="WhatsApp" data-wpil-keyword-link="linked" data-wpil-monitor-id="12060">WhatsApp group, titled “Here we Goooooo”, was active between December 2021 and May 2022 and included a senior officer—referred to as Officer A—who is currently facing separate misconduct proceedings.

Offensive Messages

Officer A, described as an older and respected member of a South london/">LONDON" target="_blank" rel="noopener" title="London" data-wpil-keyword-link="linked" data-wpil-monitor-id="190769">London response team, posted a barrage of offensive and misogynistic messages, including:

  • Referring to a rape victim as a “c*”** who should be “locked up”
  • Claiming she was likely “raw dogged” in a park by “two blokes after a night out”
  • Suggesting a colleague should be “anally raped
  • Using slurs such as “retard” and “spastic” to describe others
  • Labeling female officers as “mental or slags or both

Officers Failed to Intervene

Despite witnessing these messages, none of the three probationary officers challenged their superior.

PC Lindill, who is of Moroccan descent, described the comments as “deeply shameful, derogatory and wholly unacceptable” but said he had seen Officer A as a role model.

PC Humphrey admitted to being afraid of retaliation if he reported the messages. PC Hawkins denied seeing many of the comments but accepted that he did not report, endorse, or repeat them.

Misconduct Findings

The gross misconduct hearing concluded that while the officers breached standards of professional behaviour, their failings did not warrant dismissal.

Commander Katie Lilburn, who chaired the panel, ruled their conduct amounted to misconduct rather than gross misconduct. She said the trio’s silence had the potential to damage the Met’s reputation and undermine public trust, particularly in the force’s ability to tackle rape and violence against women.

The officers were issued formal written warnings, which will remain on their records for 18 to 24 months.

Public Confidence in Policing

The case comes at a time when the Metropolitan Police faces ongoing scrutiny over its internal culture and handling of misconduct and abuse cases, especially those involving violence against women.

Commander Lilburn acknowledged the public’s concerns and reaffirmed the importance of accountability and cultural reform within the force.

Officer A, whose messages were at the centre of the investigation, is still under review and could face more severe consequences in a separate disciplinary process.

 

We are your go-to destination for breaking UK news, real-life stories from communities across the country, striking images, and must-see video from the heart of the action.

Follow us on Facebook at for the latest updates and developing stories, and stay connected on X (Twitter) the for live coverage as news breaks across the UK.

SIGN UP NOW FOR YOUR FREE DAILY BREAKING NEWS AND PICTURES NEWSLETTER

Your information will be used in accordance with our Privacy Policy

YOU MIGHT LIKE