Scottish Lawyers Slam Gov’s Plan to Axe Jury Trials for Rape Cases
At least seven legal groups have already given the thumbs down to the Scottish government’s controversial plan to scrap jury trials for rape and attempted rape cases. The idea? To have a single judge or sheriff decide guilt, aiming to boost Scotland’s shockingly low conviction rates.
Legal Pros Cry Foul: “Knee-Jerk Reaction”
Stuart Murray, vice president of the Scottish Solicitors Bar Association, blasted the proposal as a “knee-jerk reaction” that ignores professional advice. Speaking to the BBC, he predicted a near-unanimous boycott across bar associations, warning the move could seriously damage Scotland’s justice system.
Convictions for Rape a Dismal 51%
The pilot scheme, pushed by Scotland’s No.2 judge Lady Dorrian, is part of the Victims, Witnesses and Justice Reform (Scotland) Bill. Current stats reveal only 51% conviction rates on rape and attempted rape, compared to a massive 91% for all other crimes.
Government Stands Firm Despite Backlash
First Minister Humza Yousaf defends the radical plan, but legal experts slam it for lacking evidence and risking the diversity of the legal system. Critics argue rape trials are inherently “more intimate” — often without CCTV or clear witness accounts — making a single judge trial risky.
Justice Secretary Angela Constance disputes claims the government is bulldozing the lawyers. She insists there’s “overwhelming” evidence juries misunderstand rape, and promises wide consultation with lawyers, victims, and academics as the bill moves through Parliament.
