Merseyside Police have issued a warning after an “incorrect” name for the alleged Southport attacker was widely circulated online.
Police have urged people not to speculate on details of the incident, saying the name being shared on social media is “incorrect.
In a statement, Merseyside Police said: “A name has been shared on social media in connection with the suspect in the incident in Southport. This name is incorrect and we would urge people not to speculate on details of the incident while the investigation is ongoing.”
The force also confirmed: “This incident is not currently being treated as terror-related and we are not looking for anyone else in connection with it.”
Current Status of the Investigation
So far, police have confirmed the arrest of a 17-year-old from Banks, Lancashire, on suspicion of murder and attempted murder following the mass stabbing that left three children dead.
Why the Suspect Remains Unnamed
Anonymity for Youths in Law
In criminal law, youths are often granted anonymity to protect them in various legal settings. There is an automatic ban on identifying children in youth court proceedings. In cases involving the crown court, judges can impose reporting restrictions under Section 45 of the Youth Justice and Criminal Evidence Act 1999, ensuring anonymity.
However, media law expert David Banks explains that while Section 44 of the same act, which provides anonymity from the moment a criminal investigation begins, has not yet been activated, this creates a loophole where the suspect could technically be named. But in practice, media outlets often choose not to exploit this loophole.
Potential Changes in Anonymity
If the suspect turns 18, he will not automatically be entitled to anonymity and could be named, particularly if he reaches the age of majority before any court proceedings begin, should charges be filed.
The Editors’ Code of Practice
The Independent Press Standards Organisation (IPSO) Editors’ Code of Practice advises editors to avoid naming children who are arrested unless their identity is already in the public domain. The code allows for exceptions if there is a significant public interest, though this requires a higher threshold for cases involving minors.
Precedents and Public Interest
In past incidents, such as the 2014 murder of Leeds teacher Ann Maguire by 15-year-old Will Cornick, youths have been named due to overwhelming public interest. Banks notes that while this is rare, extraordinary and horrific events may lead to debates about the public interest in identifying suspects.
Conclusion
The Southport incident has prompted significant public and media interest, but legal and ethical guidelines currently prevent the naming of the 17-year-old suspect. Authorities continue to urge the public and media to refrain from speculation and to respect the ongoing investigation.
If you have any information about the incident, please contact Merseyside Police on 101 or Crimestoppers anonymously on 0800 555 111.
